Thesis #74 of 95. Like Isaac, those within the Covenants of Promise are elected through unmerited grace.

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Gen17:18-20 Abraham said to God, “Oh that Ishmael might live before You!”  But God said, “No, but your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you shall name him Isaac; and I will establish My covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him.  As for Ishmael, I have heard you; behold, I will bless him, and make him fruitful and multiply him exceedingly.

Gal4:28 And you, brothers and sisters, like Isaac, are the children of promise.

Phil3:13-14 Brothers, I do not regard myself as possessing it as yet, but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

COMMENTS

This follows on from the previous thesis’s assertion that the Church like Isaac are the children of promise. Yet the Church has generally understood there to be one covenant for each testament period and an exclusive one at that. Such a concept should be repudiated, firstly by the reality of Abel and others declared righteous before the Abrahamic Covenant was established. Still more so by the story of Ishmael. He had been circumcised, blessed by God and by his father Abraham, sent on his way in peace. Yet he was excluded from the covenant initiated through his father, for the seed of his union with Sarah were to be the children of promise.

And such is the Church in the current dispensation (Gal4:28). Yet through Abraham, all nations were to be blessed, and that included the twelve that would spring from the seed of his son Ishmael, yet not necessarily through incorporation into an exclusive covenant.

Covenantal election

The point of the thesis is that Isaac had been elected to that exclusive covenant, and Paul mentions him by name as effectively he is its patriarchal head, Abraham’s other son Ishmael having been excluded. It therefore hardly needs to be said that Isaac’s election was entirely a matter of grace. He was chosen simply because he was the child promised to Sarah and Abraham in their old age.

The same is effectively the case for those who are called out from the world and into the Church [Greek ἐκκλησία = the called-out ones]. Such all-of-grace election and the staggering rewards that go with it (Rev3:21😲) may appear to challenge God’s loving and equitable nature. Not so once the self-sacrificial demands and conditionality of attaining such a goal has been grasped (Phi3:13-14 above) together with an understanding of biblical salvation’s context within broader benign providence that i have been outlining.

Free PDF of The Little Book of Providence HERE

Larger version suitable for mobile phones HERE

יִצְחָ֔ק FACEBOOK page HERE

“The righteous shall be victorious in the name of the Lord of Spirits and He will cause the others to witness this that they may repent and forgo the works of their hands. They shall have no honour through the name of the Lord of Spirits yet through His name they shall be saved, and the Lord of Spirits shall have compassion on them, for His compassion is great. And He is righteous also in His judgement, and in the presence of His glory unrighteousness shall also not maintain itself: at His judgement the unrepentant shall perish before Him" [Enoch ch50 Charles translation]

If you have been following this timeline since its inception you will know that 90%+ of my posts concern the bible, not ex-canonical Enoch. Yet it does have a role in helping our understanding of canonical scripture, which for many remains something of a puzzle. The Book of Enoch’s opening verse indicates why it was providentially excluded from the biblical canon. It was not intended for the Church through her history but for the final generation of Christians: “The words of the blessing of Enoch, wherewith he blessed the elect and the righteous who will be living in the day of tribulation when all the wicked and godless are to be removed [Enoch ch1 verse 1]

The key point I am highlighting from Enoch chapter 50 is that there are not two but three categories of people identified at the end-of-age judgement. The same eschatological trichotomy is implicit in the last chapter of the New Testament with respect to the New Jerusalem. Rev21 describes this mystical entity as a bride adorned for her Husband.

THE NEW JERUSALEM

The city is enormous in size and the saints of God are its inhabitants – they are the bride. Yet we also read in verse 24 that “the nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it”. Or as some versions/manuscripts render it “the nations of those that are saved…” (e.g. KJV). These cannot be the saints of God who are the “wife of the Lamb” and who inhabit the city. The likes of the Apostle Paul, Moses and Elijah do not “walk by New Jerusalem’s light” or pay occasional visits.

No, the group being referred to are those who have been saved (spared from punishment) through the compassion of God and in view of their willingness to repent and bow the knee to the King of Kings aka “the Chosen One” as the Book of Enoch describes the Son of Man.

As Paul indicated, others (a third category) who refuse to believe the Good News of Christ even after it has been made clear to them. which has certainly not been the case for most in the current age, are to be ignominiously dealt with (“set ablaze”) at Christ’s appearing (2Thes1:8).

FINAL JUDGEMENT ACCORDING TO ENOCH

Likewise in Enoch’s prophecy there are three groups. Firstly, the elect righteous, sometimes referred to as “the chosen ones”. They are those who had been “victorious in the name of the Lord of Spirits” and who shall receive honour and praise, even from the angels (40:5) [If you are uncomfortable with that idea then you should observe how Jesus describes His elect in Revelation (3:21) – for the LJC regards His faithful disciples as His own kith and kin and corporate bride-to-be, indicating the elect are to attain both royal and divine status (cf. Heb2:10-11)].

As should be evident from Scripture as a whole, this group are, proportionally speaking, a minority. Given the world’s cultural and religious formation, not to mention the catastrophic historical ecclesiological fracture brought about by the “Reformation”, most human beings have never received an accurate account ofthe path to glory, still less embarked and persevered along it.

THE ROLE OF NATURAL LAW

Hence the divinely ordered but confusingly depicted “natural law”, for as I have previously explained, it pertains to that which is spiritual and to Christ as Logos as much as to any laws of nature. An effectual role for such was acknowledged by the earliest Christian writers such as Irenaeus (pupil of Polycarp, the pupil of the apostle John) and Eusebius (3^rd century Church historian) who through his explicit references to natural law indicated such had been understood within the Church up to that point. But (typically) such divine benevolence was rejected by 4th /5th century Augustine and much later by the Protestant Reformers who built on that fearsome Western Father’s “theology of sovereign grace”.

For natural law in this context (outlined below) infers a benevolence on God’s part and an underlying goodness on humanity’s part that such theologians and their adherents regard as abhorrent. It undermines “the gospel” as they understand it. Satan would despise it also (the clue is in the meaning of his name – the Adversary). He will have been more than happy for the Creator to be presented as incomprehensibly harsh and unjust from a human perspective, and for men and women to be regarded as virtually depraved by nature, with gospel evangelism adapted accordingly.

THE DEPOSIT OF FAITH

Second century Christian writers knew better, not because they were superior biblical exegetes but because they had received the full deposit of faith in written AND verbal form (2Thes2:15KJV), either from the apostles themselves, their proteges such as Timothy, Titus and Philemon or those men’s immediate successors – which takes us into the early 2^nd century.

Hence, Justyn Martyr had spoken of God’s benevolence towards all who endeavour to walk uprightly and in accordance with right reason^[1];  God, he wrote, is One who accepts those who imitate His own qualities of temperance, fairness and philanthropy and who exercise their free will in choosing what is pleasing to Him^[2]. Irenaeus, also 2nd century, recognized that God in His providence is present with all who attend to moral discipline”^[3] paying heed to the natural precepts of the law by which man can be justified^[4].

THE LIMITATIONS OF NATURAL LAW

To such men, God was comprehensively and comprehensibly adorable. He was just, He was good, He was compassionate, just as human beings understand those terms. And that is why the Creator has ensured that every human being has been provided with the innate ability ultimately to be united to Himself, but NOT to be delivered from the corrupting influence of mortal flesh in the present except they encounter the grace of Christ in the gospel – Rom7:24-25).

Through the faculty of conscience, most have an internal urge to do what is right. They inwardly delight in what is virtuous even though they usually fail to live up to their moral aspirations (cf. Rom7:22-23). The architect-in-chief of Western theology on the other hand asserted that man by nature could do “absolutely no good thing, whether in thought or will, affection or action”^[5]. That is an affront to divine providence as much as it is to humanity.

CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL

Yet there are some to whom such a description does apply: the twice dead (in mind AND spirit– Jud1:12). These are the theologically eluded category threes: children of the devil. In Enoch’s language they are the wicked and godless. In the secular world they are akin to psychopaths, whether criminal or respectable. Such peoples’ universally observed characteristics closely align with Scripture’s presentation of those who, like their archetype Cain are not “of God” (1Jn3:12). They are devoid of a functioning conscience, lacking compassion and empathy, and with no compulsion whatever to speak the truth. This eluded soteriological category of people is typically lumped in with “the unsaved”. The Little Book of Providence (chapter six) elucidates.

THE THREE SOTERIOLOGICAL CATEGORIES

So, returning to the Judgement, in Enoch’s parable there are likewise three categories. Firstly, the righteous; secondly, those who witness the vindication of the righteous and repent of their own wrongdoings. They are saved (i.e. spared from punishment) through God’s compassion. But they are not honoured to the degree of those who had obeyed the gospel. For only those who have partaken of the means of grace and been formed by divine teaching have souls fitted for immediate magisterial service in Christ’s Kingdom.

Thirdly, there are those who refuse to repent and shall “perish before Him”. One might wonder who on earth WOULD refuse to repent knowing the fate that awaits them. Likewise in New Testament accounts, who would NOT be willing to bow the knee to Jesus Christ when He is revealed to the world in His majestic glory? Category threes will already know the answer. For Jesus Christ is the summation of all that is good. He is therefore an abhorrence to them (for familial reasons – 1Jn3:12). They cannot “repent” any more than a goat can become a sheep or tares become wheat. They cannot become something they no longer are. That is, a human being who in any measure reflects the image of God, being the personification of love.

COMPLETING THE SCRIPTURAL JIGSAW

Be assured, the theology I have outlined does not derive from the Book of Enoch. It is the New Testament – the teaching of Jesus and Paul in particular. And all have been reconciled and integrated with the teaching of the whole bible in The Little Book of Providence. Nevertheless, the Book of Enoch helps fill out the detail and complete the jigsaw. Otherwise, aspects of the bible would remain a puzzle, such as the rationale for the universal flood. Also, the existence of gigantic hybrids referred to in the OT relating to the conquest and ethnic cleansing of Canaanite territories.

Thereby can God’s justice and judgements be clarified and vindicated. Mankind’s contribution to the woes and evils of this world is substantive. But it is secondary to that of fallen members of the angelic realm. That reality is more clearly presented in Enoch than canonical scripture. That is in view of the greater detail provided concerning the judgements and destinies of the respective parties.

THE FOCUS OF THE BIBLE

That in part is because canonical Scripture’s focus is the salvation history of the world. It is centred on Christ and His peculiar peoples – the Jewish nation and the Church. It was never intended to be a comprehensive account of God’s creation. The origins, history and destiny of the angelic realm are a prime example. Enoch, albeit often obscurely, goes into far more detail. Likewise, God’s providential intentions towards creation as a whole. These are alluded to in the bible, but often cryptically so. They are passages that typically biblical theologians label as difficult or anomalous.

Not so this “armchair theologian”, who is no theologian at all in any academic sense. I am merely someone who has received revelatory insights concerning biblical interpretation. And especially those that impact upon the context of Israel and the Church within God’s broader benevolent providence. I believe also that such an eventuality together with this writing has been prophetically foretold; most clearly but not exclusively in the Book of Enoch.

---

EARLY FATHER CITATIONS:

[1]  The first apology of Justin chaps. 43 & 46

[2]  ibid. chap. 10

[3]  Irenaeus against heresies Book III chap. 25 (para 1)

[4] Ibid. Book IV chap. 13 para 1

[5]  “On Rebuke and Grace” – chap. 3

Thesis #71 of 95 - The Abrahamic covenant superseded by the Covenant of Christ's blood are exclusive covenants

Thesis #72 of 95 - Ishmael was blessed by God and his father Abraham but not elected to the exclusive covenant designated for Isaac and his seed

Thesis #73 of 95 - The Church, like Isaac, are the children of promise

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Gen4:7 (Masoretic) If you (Cain) do what is right will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, Sin is crouching at the portal and desired to have you – you must master him

Gen4:13-14 Cain replied to the Lord, my punishment is too much for me to bear; THIS DAY you are driving me from the land and I WILL BE HIDDEN FROM YOUR PRESENCE

Gen17:20-21 (KJV) As for Ishmael I have heard thee: behold I have blessed him and will make him fruitful… but my covenant I will establish with Isaac

Gal4:28 And you, brothers (and sisters), like Isaac, are the children of promise.

Eph1:4-5 God chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him in love. He predestined us to adoption as sons and daughters through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will

Jam1:18 Through His own predetermined will He gave us birth by the word of truth, so that we would be a kind of first fruits among His creatures.

COMMENTS

This pertains to a crucial aspect of divine providence, being the main topic of the second chapter of The Little Book of Providence. Such needs to be consulted to provide an adequate explanation for these three related theses. For that chapter equally concerns a related overarching covenant in which Cain and Abel were the players (Gen4:7-14).

Unlike the Abrahamic and Christian covenants referred to in these theses, that was a universal and inclusive covenant. And seemingly it has been universally eluded by theologians. Christians therefore usually understood there to be one soteriological covenant for each testament period. And whether or not they discern or acknowledge the matter, it is exclusive in nature.

These theses repudiate that notion, firstly by observing that Abel and many others were declared righteous before the Abrahamic Covenant was established. Secondly, by the narrative concerning Ishmael. He had been circumcised, blessed by God and by his father Abraham and sent on his way in peace. Yet he was excluded from the covenant initiated through his father. For the seed of his union with Sarah were to be the children of promise. And in view of the indisputably biblical principle of election/predestination featuring in recent posts, such is the Church in the current epoch.

As Paul affirmed, it is the church who like Isaac are the children of promise (Gal4:28). And baptized Christians are in the elective covenant that replaced Abraham’s and they are there by grace alone. Others like Ishmael are loved by God but not elected to that exclusive family predestined before the foundation of the world to form the community in which the education and spiritual resources are provided for individuals to become holy and faultless in love before God through Jesus Christ (Eph1:4-5). Such is the Church, priesthood for the world, brought forth by God’s will to be the first fruit of a restored universe (Jam1:18).

Free PDF of The Little Book of Providence HERE

Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE

Thesis #70 of 95 - By attending to the means of grace and persevering in the faith the Christian is enabled to “possess his vessel in sanctification and honour”. Such is the immediate purpose of Christian salvation as well as a preparation for future glory as the corporate Bride of Christ

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

1Thes4:4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour (KJV)

1Thes5:23 – Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely; and may your SPIRIT AND SOUL AND BODY be kept complete, without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Rom8:16 – The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God

Gal6:18 – The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers and sisters. Amen.

COMMENTS

This thesis pertains to the human soul: its origins and nature, which I described in the Little Book of Providence as follows:

A creationist understanding of the soul’s origin^[1] maintains that each person’s soul/spirit, i.e. that which is separated from the body at death, is created immediately by God and planted into the embryo procreated by the parents. Such has been the prevalent view within Eastern Orthodoxy and is also the official teaching of the Roman Church^[2] albeit Augustine had wavered from it. Through original sin, the divinely created spirit finds itself within a morally sickly environment, or expressed another way is required to operate through an impure medium – the procreated body of death. Physiologically the physical and spiritual entities (body and soul/spirit) are in union, yet they have opposing moral impulses. Augustine, considered to be the first Christian anthropologist had started well, aptly applying the analogy “your body is your wife”: the couple were once in perfect harmony but following the Fall are in combat with one another. Paul however goes further: these two entities are influenced by separate and distinct laws or engrained principles; the body, being the corrupted medium through which the soul/spirit (Paul’s “inner man”) functions, has impulses of its own:

“For I am gratified by the law of God in my inner man, but I perceive a different law in my bodily members warring with the law in my mind and bringing me into captivity to the sinful law that is in my bodily members”^[3]

The “law in one’s members” refers to the senses perceived through the members of the body processed by the brain, an organ that, it must be remembered, is part of the procreated vessel through which the divinely planted soul/spirit must operate. Like the rest of the body it ultimately derives from fallen Adam’s loins and is heading for the grave. The human psyche, emotions and motivations cannot be contained within that vital organ or entirely derived from it, for when the soul leaves the body it is conscious and memory-retaining as Scripture affirms; the rich man wondering why he must experience suffering in Hades was told by Abraham to “remember that in your lifetime you received good things and likewise Lazarus evil things, so now he is comforted and you are tormented”^[4]. Paul’s reference in this context to the “law of God” is referring to a moral sense of right and wrong, in particular the need to exercise love and consideration for others, which the apostle confirms was always the law’s (and the Torah’s) heart and purpose^[5]. It is intuitive, being the outworking of the human conscience^[6] which is clear or “clean” when one obeys that principle, guilty when one does not.

[Extract from “The Little Book of Providence” chapter two.]

---

[1] Explanation and historical background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism_%28soul%29

[2] Catechism of the Catholic Church #366 http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1B.HTM

[3] Rom7:23

[4] Lk16:25

[5] Rom13:9-10

[6] Rom2:15

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The seemingly obvious yet often eluded point to grasp is that the soul and the vessel (body and brain) it inhabits during mortal life are both intellectual entities. That results in the mental conflict Paul is referring to in Romans chapter seven. It is usually translated and interpretated as pertaining to the Holy Spirit versus sinful human nature as a whole. In fact the apostle is referring to the contrasting laws (i.e. governing principles) of the universal God-given spirit (“inner man” incorporating the conscience) versus the thinking and processing of the human brain. Hence, Paul’s summation of salvation in Christ – what it is from and what it is for – Rom7:23-25.

Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE

Thesis #69 of 95 - What Christians are being saved from is the malign influence of the mortal intellectual vessel which the soul/spirit currently inhabits

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Rom7:23-24 I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my (spiritual) mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members. Oh, wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God it is through Jesus Christ our Lord.

1Pet4:6 For the gospel has for this purpose been preached even to those who are dead, that though they are judged in the flesh as people, they may live in the spirit according to the will of God.

Mk9:49-50 For everyone will be salted with fire, salt being good; but if the salt becomes unsaltable, how can it be made salty again?

Mt 15:13 But (Jesus) answered and said, “Every plant which My heavenly Father did not plant will be uprooted.

1Jn3:12a Be not as Cain, who was of the Evil One and murdered his brother. 

COMMENTS

I have been explaining that a human being’s spirit is created in God’s image before being planted into a morally disordered procreated intellectual vessel at the commencement of life. Whilst that earthen vessel’s control centre or brain is procreated, the faculties pertaining to man’s spiritual component being the part of us that survives physical death are from God. As Paul explained, that results in opposing laws governing flesh and spirit within the human psyche (cf. Rom7:23; Eccles12:7). Rejecting such a hypothesis implies either that human reproductive organs are capable of producing what is spiritual and eternal or that God through Christ directly creates and plants within man a spiritual entity polluted by sin, hateful towards its Creator and deserving of eternal torment from its conception. Neither is acceptable: the one opposes reason; the other opposes the notion of a God described In Scripture as love personified. Paul’s “body of this death” resolves the matter, indicating man’s moral and spiritual predicament to be temporal [note#1], as more explicitly does Peter (1Pet4:6).

A sinful nature cannot and does not derive from what God has directly provided to man but from the intellectual vessel procreated ultimately from our first parents that the God-given soul/spirit currently inhabits. Whilst the devil’s desire is to darken man’s mind, the Creator’s wish has always been to enlighten man. That is for the benefit of human society, the creative order set under man and the wellbeing of his own soul. Such He does through the Christ-enlightened human spirit (Jn1:9KJV) that all possess but not all reference. For not all soul were planted by God (Mt15:13; 1Jn3:12 – a recent post elucidates). Of those that are, many do not benefit from salvation in Christ whilst in mortal flesh. The post I have just highlighted delineates these distinctions.

ANNOTATIONS

NOTE #1 – By which I mean that the body and brain, unlike the soul, pertains to a temporary feature of a person’s journey through eternity. But especially in the unsaved, that vessel’s corrosive impact upon the soul can have more enduring consequences, requiring what Jesus describes as salting. But some souls will be beyond redemption, being unsaltable. (Mk9:49-50) [Considered in more detail in my interim summary post under heading “Hell – a divinely ordered establishment”] 

Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE

THESIS #68 of 95 - Partaking of the Eucharistic species is at best ineffectual if unaccompanied by the obedience of faith

BIBLICAL REFERENCE

1Cor11:26-30 As often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy way, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. But a person must examine himself, and in so doing he is to eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For the one who eats and drinks, eats and drinks judgment to himself if he does not discern the body. For this reason many among you are weak and sick, and a number are deceased.

COMMENTS

The previous few posts have examined the centrality of the Eucharist within the life of the Church and for individual Christians. In the passage quoted above, Paul is primarily concerned with how the Corinthian Christians were conducting themselves at the Lord’s Supper – disgracefully in some cases. In the wording of my thesis, their participation was not accompanied by the obedience of faith; or indeed faith itself, “failing to discern the body” (v29). But many Christians today should perhaps ask themselves, why are the penalties for partaking of the Lord’s Supper unworthily so drastic? “For this reason, many among you are weak and sick, and a number are deceased” (v30). Such would hardly be the penalty for half-hearted hymn singing or insincere praying – No, Paul is intimating here that partaking in the Lord’s Supper is quite different from any other act of worship.

A few chapters back Paul described the chalice as “the cup of blessing that we bless, being the communion of the blood of Christ” (10:16). For the first 28 years of my Christian life, I understood the bread and wine to be merely symbolic of the body and blood of Christ. My understanding has changed, particularly since the spiritual encounter that led to my book and these posts. That is especially in view of Jesus’ teaching in John 6, not least where He states:

“Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that has come down from heaven, so that anyone may eat from it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?” (Jn6:49-52)

This harks back to the previous chapter of Paul’s epistle (1Cor10) in which he warned the Corinthian Church that they were no more spiritually secure than their Jewish forefathers who were as much “the people of God” as they were. However, there is a difference, for as the text from Jn6 indicates, until Jesus was incarnated, lived, died and was resurrected, the Bread of Life and Cup of Salvation were not available. Yet if the latter were merely symbolic, why would that have mattered? But it did matter: “Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. I am the living bread that has (only now) come down from heaven” (Jn6:49). Likewise, the symbolic “drinking from the rock that represented Christ” (1Cor10) did not result in the spiritual life to which Jesus referred.

Neither did the animal sacrifices: “For the Law, since it has only a shadow of the good things to come and not the form of those things itself, can never, by the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect” (Heb10:1). The blood of Christ on the other hand provides both pardon and sanctification to the participant. Again, if the bread and wine were merely symbolic why would the animal’s blood and sacrifice that symbolically prefigured Christ’s atoning death not have been equally efficacious?

But then there is the witness of the earliest Christian writers, and that is what ratified the issue for me. The matter is of such importance that I suggest you read my earlier post focusing on this subject (link below).

THE LAST SUPPER

See more

[יִצְחָ֔ק] Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE

RE-FORMATION THESIS #67 of 95: Luther's revolt was triggered by deformed practice and doctrine within the Roman Catholic Church; but the Eastern Orthodox Church was relatively unaffected by the sixteenth century upheavals and continues to affirm the historically understood sacerdotal and sacrificial nature of the Holy Eucharist

As the wording of this thesis is intended to imply, the sixteenth century ecclesiological hiatus euphemistically termed “the Reformation” was triggered by corrupt practices and deformed doctrines within the medieval Church of Rome. The issue of “indulgencies” in particular was the focal point of Augustinian monk Brother Martin Ludher’s condemnation [note#1].  “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs” – a saying attributed to Johann Tetzel, papal seller of indulgences to raise money to rebuild St Peter’s Basilica in Rome who plied his trade in the vicinity of Luther’s home town. On reflection, what Christian would not support the Reformers in sixteenth century Europe? Seemingly spiritually insightful men pleading scriptural truths against the deformed doctrines and practices of the monolith that was the medieval Roman Catholic Church.

However, Luther merely set the ball rolling; a still more marked dissent from Catholic doctrine and teaching followed through the likes of Zwingli and Calvin which distressed the former monk greatly for he was a reluctant schismatic. To the surprise of many, he had recently said this about the Catholic Church:

“With the papacy there is a correct Holy Scripture, a correct baptism, a correct sacrament of the altar, a correct key to the forgiveness of sin, a correct preaching office, a correct catechism, Lord’s Prayer, Ten Commandments and articles of faith” [note #2]

And Luther will have hoped that once Scripture had been translated into the vernacular and more widely distributed, dissenters from Rome would come to a unified view on the key doctrines such as the Eucharist, baptism and essential church polity. But it was not to be. What is more, through the movement Luther initiated, the vernacular Protestant Bible would soon come to replace the sacrifice of the altar as the focal object of veneration in most of the breakaway churches. That has desolating consequences from the perspective of those who understand that sacrament to be central to the Faith – the means by which one experiences interior sacred communion and sanctifying grace [previous thesis]. Desolating also in view of the way that Paul’s teaching would come to be further misunderstood by many. Augustine’s one-dimensional grace analysis with its dire providential implications was built upon and reinforced by the Reformers’ doctrine of total depravity and sovereign grace theology.

Luther’s legacy

In terms of Luther’s immediate legacy, the ecclesiological fragmentation and exacerbated national and global conflict challenges his claim to be prophetic. For if a prophet (and anyone who dares challenge the established ecclesiological order in such a way had better be one) can be shown by the outcome of his predictions to have spoken presumptuously, he is no longer to be feared or listened to (cf. the testing of prophets and prophecy – Deut18:18-22). What Luther had believed and expected would happen did not happen; that is that Christians in the West, liberated from the papacy and with Bibles in hand would come to a united understanding of the essentials of the gospel. ML was personally distraught at the breakaway movement’s sub-divisions even in his own day; let alone what he would have made of the bewildering plethora of denominations that exist today.

There is a good reason for such a disastrous miscalculation: the decidedly non-perspicuous nature of Holy Scripture. For, as referred to in my interim summary (previous post), he regarded ALL the earliest Church fathers with the possible exception of Augustine to be in darkness concerning the nature of saving faith. So the Reformer provided his own solution regarding justification, law and faith, which I spent a number of posts deconstructing .

The elephant in the room

As this thesis also alludes to, the proverbial elephant in the room within the usual Reformation debate has been the perennial Eastern Orthodox Church whose priority has always been to remain faithful to the deposit of faith. For she was a relatively stable element in the sixteenth century debacle, yet her sacerdotal practice has been much the same as Rome’s. Like her they accept the real presence of Christ at the altar, regarding the Eucharist as “the awesome sacrifice entrusted to the Church to be re-enacted and given to the faithful for the nourishment of their faith and forgiveness of their sins”. For God has ensured that that the Bread of Life and Cup of Salvation has been available to the faithful in East and West and for every generation of the Christian era – within the Apostolic churches, that is. And so for the purpose of the Re-formation, it is necessary to show that the Reformation was no reformation, rather an ecclesiastical hiatus and fragmentation. It is something from which we must recover if “the body of Christ is to be built up until we all reach unity in the Faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God to a perfect man, attaining the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Eph4:13).

יִצְחָ֔ק

NOTE #1 The birthname by which Augustinian monk Brother Martin would have been known at the time. He changed his surname to “Luther” to allude to “Eleuthérios” from the Greek Ελευθέριος, meaning free or liberated. Also, no doubt in view of what his family name “Luder” actually meant in his native language.

NOTE #2 – citation: Luthers Werke 26: 147 – Weimar: Hermann Bohlaus Nachfolge

This is a summary of the theological fundamentals and biblical interpretations set out in the two books that my website and Facebook page are promoting. It also acts as an interim summary with regard to the 95 related theses currently being posted on this and other platforms.

GOD’S SECRET PLAN

The catalyst for the radical reinterpretation of the bible being presented was an understanding (or rather I believe a revelation) concerning why Paul had unexpectedly been appointed as thirteenth faithful apostle [Matthias had replaced Judas as #12]. It was in order “to preach to the gentiles the unfathomable riches of Christ, and to enlighten all people regarding the secret (plan) which had been hidden in God from previous ages (Eph3:8-9). For that secret plan is something concerning which no one appears to have discerned the providential and dispensational implications. Effectively it means that the current age is not a spiritualized fulfilment of Old Testament prophecy, but in terms of the salvation history outlined in the Law and Prophets is an inserted epoch. Paul tells us this came about to provoke God’s disbelieving chosen race to envy – by enlisting members of the Gentile nations into the messianic community (Rom11 vv11,12,15,30).

A CHANGE IN THE SUPPORTING CAST

It had long been prophesied that a coming Jewish Messiah would bring salvation to the world, but the supporting cast (Israel) who themselves had a salvific role to enact (Ex19:6; Deut4:6) had failed to fulfil God’s purposes for them. They were therefore to be replaced, or rather enhanced. That radically altered the timing for the establishment of God’s rule on earth. Observe how Paul subverts the OT prophecy concerning that rule: the feet are still beautiful but there is no longer a mention of God’s earthly rule which had been the focus of Isaiah’s proclamation [Rom10:15 vis-à-vis Is52:7]. Likewise, John the Baptist had warned of the wrath to come, and it is clear he meant pretty darn soon, for he believed it would impact the scribes and pharisees that he had scolded. And (more problematically for some), Jesus’s Olivet prophecies, especially Mt10:23 but all of them really: the Son of Man would NOT be returning in glory for a very long time. For God (the Father), under whose personal authority such matters of timing are placed (Acts1:7), will have known the Jews would fail their mission, but also that in technological and intercommunicative terms the world was nowhere near ready 2000 years ago for what needed to be enacted in preparation for Christ’s rule on earth.  As the Romans11 references affirm (which in view of how the rest of the New Testament has been interpreted are rarely taken as read), it had not been anticipated (i.e. prophesied in the Old Testament) that non-Jews could be “saved” in the sense of being raised to eternal life in the current age, hence Peter and others’ surprise and confusion when they were (Acts11:17-18; 26:18).

THE REALLY GOOD NEWS

This dispensational shift, once comprehended, is wondrous news. The providential implications are glorious, especially with respect to the prospects for the many who do not, and unless spiritually aided cannot encounter the grace of Christ in the gospel. For let there be no dissembling: Jesus, Paul, John and Luke (in Acts) affirm that fallen man is incapable of coming to salvation in Christ unless divinely enabled to do so (e.g., Jn1:13 & 6:44; Rom8:29; Acts13:48). It is the Church, like Isaac who are the children of promise (Gal4:28). Ishmael, Isaac’s half-brother, though blessed by God and Abraham was excluded. Likewise today, for those who have been regenerated through infant baptism, it will have been a matter of grace and election. Even for adult converts, faith in Christ “is not of oneself, it is a gift of God” (Eph2:8 cf. Acts13:48).

Nor can these references to predestination be referring to God foreknowing who would accept the gospel, for that would be election based on merit. For nothing can be more meritorious than being prepared to give up one’s worldly ambitions to serve Christ. No, Paul is adamant that election is not based on merit, either actual or foreseen – and so was Jesus (Jn6:44). [Election, I say, not final salvation]. For as I have been explaining, attaining the prize of final salvation and the rewards that go with it (co-heirship with Christ, no less) is another matter (e.g.,1Cor9:24). For to remain within the covenant of promise requires personal cooperation and active participation in the life of Christ (Rom5:10). One must suffer with Him if one is to be glorified with Him (Rom8:17). One needs to have become conformed to His image (Rom8:2).

CONTEXT OF CHURCH IN BROADER PROVIDENCE

Likewise, such election/predestination does not determine who are the children of God (cf. Rom8:21) but who shall be THE FIRSTBORN of God’s human family. That is why the Church is described as “the assembly of the firstborn” (Heb12:23: “πρωτοτόκων” being plural – it is not referring to Christ but His people): the royal priesthood of God (1Pet2:9). And as just shown, these must potentially be prepared to give up everything in this life for the privilege (Mt16:24-25), affirming once again God’s sublime equity. He is fair to all. That is something which can only be perceived applying a dual perspective interpretation on salvation (next paragraph). Otherwise one must either “go liberal”, rejecting the bible’s teaching on predestination altogether, or adopt the Protestant Reformers’ maxim, “Let God be God”, i.e. He may appear unjust and cruel to us but that is His prerogative. It is but He isn’t, and Paul has affirmed it – God is no respecter of persons but is fair and just to all (Rom2:6-16). That is a passage I once regarded as anomalous, but now I delight in it – it’s the rest of Romans I had failed to understand. It affirms the Creator’s thoroughly intelligible justice as Someone not only to fear but adore. Truly, we shall praise God with uprightness of heart once we have learnt of His righteous judgements.

CLARIFYING MATTHEW 25

Once the bifold nature of salvation has been identified, Paul can be taken at his word (even in Romans 11). That is, that Gentiles would not have “been saved” in the current age if Israel had not failed its mission. But that would not have meant they would have had to proselytise or face perdition. The soul going to heaven or otherwise is rarely if ever what Paul is referring to, whereas Jesus clearly was making such a delineation in His parable of the sheep and goats (Mt25). But note, it is a passage where religion is not mentioned or even implied, merely that the “sheep” had exercised compassion and that Jesus regarded their help of the poor as service to Himself (v40).

For the Lord, as is sometimes the case with the Apostle John, is here distinguishing between those who are of God and those who are the children of the devil (1Jn3:10). Gospel salvation on the other hand relates to spiritual cleansing and empowering to relate to the Godhead whilst still in human flesh. Such is necessary for those who are to be most closely associated with Christ in the age to come. Such faithful disciples are also described as God’s elect: the firstborn of God’s human family and a kind of first fruit of the created order (James1:18). The rest (i.e., man by nature) Paul describes as being “dead in trespasses and sins” (Eph2:1). But the “death” to which Paul refers pertains not to the soul but to the procreated intellectual vessel that the spiritual/eternal part of us currently inhabits, preventing the soul from experiencing a cognisant relationship with God, our conscience becoming defiled by “dead works” (Heb9:14). The restoration of such a relationship is what the bible means by eternal life (Jn17:3 cf. 1Jn3:15 – note the present tense).

THE INNER CONFLICT

Relatedly, in one of the most crucial yet misunderstood passages in the New Testament, the apostle describes the vessel inhabited by the soul as “the body of THIS death” (Rom7:24 check Greek), for he is referring to the condition he had been describing in the preceding passage. That pertained to the inner conflict between the bodily senses processed through the brain (resulting in the aforementioned “dead works” and defiled conscience) and the nobler instincts of the inner man or spirit: “For I joyfully agree with the law of God in the inner man but I see a different law in the members of my body waging war against the law of my (spiritual) mind, making me a prisoner of the law of sin – that law which is in my body’s parts” (Rom7:22-23). That is affirming that it is not the God-given soul per se that is the source of mankind’s problem with sin but the procreated intellectual vessel (body and brain) with which it is associated whilst in mortal flesh.

This is MORE good news, given that it is something temporal that prevents mankind from rightly relating to God and falling into sin, not that which is eternal (1Pet4:6 & 3:19-20; cf. Gen6:3 strictly YLT). Note from the Genesis verse, God’s reference to “My spirit” cannot be the Holy Spirit for the latter is not possessed by all men whereas a God-given spirit is (1Thes5:23), albeit the post-Augustinian Church teaches otherwise. God did mankind a favour by shortening his lifespan as recorded in Genesis, knowing that the spirit He provided would always contend and fail against the flesh (body and brain) whilst they were co-existent. At least that is the case for the many who would not respond to the gospel to partake of Christ’s body and blood and be raised to eternal life (Jn6:53).

HEAVEN AND THE NEED FOR THE OTHER PLACE

The events of Eden did not change God’s ultimate intentions towards those He had made in His image. He wanted them to “become like one of Us” (Gen3:22) – but not before they were ready. Satan persuaded Eve and Adam there was no need to wait. As a result of the fallout, it became necessary that man become re-accustomed to God and the things of God; likewise, the Word of God condescended to become accustomed to man through His incarnation. For the Christian, such divine pedagogy commences during earthly life through a living relationship with that same incarnate Word. But such reacquaintance with God and the things of God shall be required for all who are to play a positive role in the new heavens and earth where righteousness prevails, so for most the refamiliarization must continue after physical death (cf. 1Pet4:6). Depending on what one’s soul has become, the transformation required may be difficult and painful, but infinitely worth it, but for a few it will prove to be impossible – because they are unsaltable (below).

As a palliative to what I wrote in a recent post concerning the true Church and the eucharist, those who in their lifetime have worshipped Christ and sought to serve Him, regardless of their denominational allegiance, will clearly be at an advantage in respect of their citizenship of Christ’s Kingdom. As, to an extent, will all those of faith who fear the god of their understanding or cultural upbringing. Indeed, such allegiance will have been the only right and proper response to their consciences given their ignorance of the gospel (cf. Acts17:29-31KJV). It will have been a preparation for the worship and service of the true God, Son and Spirit. Likewise, everyone regardless of any religious faith at all, who in the language of second century Irenaeus, “attend to moral discipline” [Ref#1], “paying heed to the natural precepts of the law by which man can be justified” [Ref#2]. Regrettably for those of my former ilk, “imputed righteousness” will have no role to play. It is our soul that enters eternity in the state it is at death, or else it would not be our life. For “righteousness” or the lack of it is what we are or have become. It is our true self with which God wishes to relate and unite to Himself; He already relates to His Son.

HELL – A DIVINELY ORDERED ESTABLISHMENT

At this point it is helpful to refer to Jesus’ teaching in Mt5:22, carefully noting THE GRADATIONS.  “I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be answerable to the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be answerable to the Sanhedrin, whilst whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into hell fire”. This reflects the absurdity of traditional Western teaching on hell: It is never all or nothing (“eternal damnation”). Nevertheless, for those whose misuse of their bodily members and senses has compromised the integrity of their soul (Mt5:29-30), Jesus affirms directly in the context of hell’s punishments that such must “be salted with fire, SALT BEING GOOD“. However, “if the salt becomes unsaltable, how shall it be made salty again? Better to have salt in yourselves and be at peace with one another” (Mk9:49-50).

Neither is hell administered by demons with pitchforks as depicted in some medieval paintings, but by God, His saints and angels (cf. Lk16:25 – it is strictly Hades but note the administrator (Abraham) and why Lazarus is being comforted – it has nothing to do with religion or having lived a sinless life). For, Jesus insists, everyone must be salted, if not in this life, then in the next (cf. Lk6:24-25). My book explains why this must be (ch.7). Your Church is unlikely to, for most have yet to grasp this mystery, yet it’s potentially the most wonderful news of all. Don’t mistake me: Hell incorporates an element of punishment (for sure) and is best avoided. But for most attendees it is primarily a place of learning (the hard way), self-enlightenment, preparation and purification. For there is no distinction between the fires of hell and “purgatory” either in the bible or the writings of those who had received the Faith directly from the apostle.

In the worst cases, in view of what a few individuals have become in life (irredeemably corrupt), they could never still be themselves and exist within “new heavens and a new earth where righteousness dwells” that Peter sought after. It is best for such and everyone else that after due punishment they cease to exist. For they are “unsaltable, good for nothing, to be cast out and trodden under foot” (Mt5:13).

God’s hatred of evil, proportional punishment and redistributive/compensatory justice are the outworking of His love, as all who possess the mind of Christ should discern. Such was third century Origen: “God confers benefits justly and punishes with kindness; since neither goodness without justice nor justice without goodness can display the real dignity of the divine nature” (Origen de Principiis Book II chap5 para 3).

HEAVEN’S REQUIREMENT

As already intimated, the souls of all people of good will (who already have salt in themselves), regardless of their faults and failings or any religious faith shall ultimately be accepted into God’s kingdom and have the joy of being reunited with those they have loved and lost. The Son of Man teaches that heaven’s requirement is simply to have possessed and practiced “agape”, being the essence of God Himself (Mt25:40; cf. 1Jn4:8). In other words (and this will confuse many but is explained in my post on the subject) the Mt25 “sheep” were justified BY FAITH working through love (Gal5:6).

THE DISCIPLES’ REQUIREMENT

However, Christian faith, obedience to the laws of Christ, self-discipline and attendance to the sacraments of Holy Church are required to be “saved to the uttermost”. That is to be fitted to become the corporate bride of Christ, even to share His throne (Rev3:21). This is for the proportionally few who are called, chosen and faithful. Like Paul they “press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus” (Phi3:14). 😲What? “Did you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win” (1Cor9:24). And truly, unless one has been divinely selected to do so, one will not even enter the race (cf. Acts13:48; Jn6:44; Rom8:29 inter alia)

GOD’S BROADER SALVIFIC AGENDA

Yet the Creator has made it clear that He sent His Son to SAVE THE WORLD and desires that ALL would be soul-healed and come to a knowledge of the truth. He does not achieve that by despatching the bulk of humanity to a lost eternity for failing to do what we have already shown from Scripture they were incapable of doing. Being, like Paul, an athlete for Christ to attain to God is one thing; avoiding perdition by showing oneself to be truly human (Mt25) is another. EVERYTHING fits into place once this salvific distinction has been apprehended – and God is shown to be what He truly is: comprehensively and comprehensibly adorable.

WHAT ELSE?

There are yet more interpretative errors that God will have determined should be sustained until these very last days: an eluded covenant (Gen4); misunderstanding aspects of faith and justification; failure to distinguish “children of the devil” from “the unsaved”; the non-imputation of Adam’s guilt to his offspring… I could go on (and on). With respect to traditional systematized Western biblical theology, what I have effectively been saying is “rip it up and start again”. Except there is no need – the task has already been completed and set out in The Little Book of Providence, albeit with about as much erudition as this retired London bus driver (aka “Charton” – Note#1) could be expected to muster. Yet the book’s intrinsic coherence and its ability to enable scripture to cohere is, I believe, unprecedented. For knowing myself and my own limitations I am convinced it is the work of God and the fulfilment of prophecy. That such a process as this should occur at all is more explicitly intimated in the Book of Enoch – extra-canonical scripture written to be a blessing to the final generation of Christians, as its opening verse declares.

LESS RADICAL THAN LUTHER

I sense what many might be thinking (🤣 or 😒) but what Luther and the Reformers proposed and implemented 500 years ago was far more radical than this. Their “rip it up and start again” approach applied not only to doctrine but to the universal Church – the very body of Christ. Not only that, but in view of the traditional dualistic interpretation of biblical salvation they shared with the medieval Catholic Church, Protestants were effectively saying that what was required of men and women to escape eternal torment had been largely unknown and untaught by the churches for the previous thousand or more years. And for the first 28 years of my Christian life I, albeit unwittingly, went along with this travesty. I now know it to be an extraordinary affront on our loving Heavenly Father’s providential care of humanity and Christ’s stewardship of His people through the centuries. Yet I in the past and Evangelicals today are typically oblivious to the implications of their founders’ assertions. For many are simply not au fait with the earliest Fathers’ writings, nor aware of Luther’s preposterous proposal that those men, some of whom had been directly tutored by the apostles, could uniformly have been in darkness concerning the essentials of saving faith [Quotation below].

I on the other hand have made it clear throughout that a true Church has always existed, albeit divided for the last 1000 years into East (Orthodox) and West (Catholic). Each has provided everything necessary (and some more besides) for fulness of salvation. What has been lacking, more particularly in the West, apart from the vital contribution of the many sincere and vibrant believers in Christ who became Evangelical, is nevertheless radical, indeed almost laughable “(יִצְחָ֔ק)” [note#1]. That is a right understanding of what humanity is intended to be saved from: not the pollution of an intrinsically corrupted soul but the moral degeneracy of the temporary intellectual vessel it inhabits (cf. Rom7:24). And what salvation is for: not to escape a wrathful God’s predisposition to condemn imperfect souls to hell, but to partake of the divine nature whilst still in mortal flesh (proto-theosis). That is so that those predestined to the role are fitted for immediate participation in Christ’s rule in the age to come.

PREMILLENNIALISM – PREVALENT DOCTRINE OF THE EARLY CHURCH

As Wikipedia affirms such a premillennial perspective was the prevailing understanding of the early Church. The first notable opposition was from Marcion, a heretic who rejected the incarnation of Christ and the canonicity of the Old Testament. More significantly, third century Origen came openly to oppose the doctrine, having an over-spiritualized perspective on events relating to the second coming of Christ. Still more influential was Augustine’s change of mind on the subject. That typically ensured the doctrine was dropped by the Church thereafter. For as a leading Anglican scholar in the wiki article rightly observed, all medieval theology is essentially Augustinian – and the Protestant Reformers built on it. [If Augustine got it wrong, we are all in trouble, so here we all are]. Apart from the witness of those early premillennialists who had most immediately received the Faith from the apostles, my opening point concerning God’s secret plan (the inserted epoch) reinforces the rationale for a terrestrial age to follow the current one.

Unlike the separated assemblies, the true Church (East and West) has not been guilty of inadvertently demeaning Christ’s historical care and oversight of the very people He regards as His OWN FLESH AND BONES (Eph5:30KJV). But largely in view of her incomplete understanding of salvation’s nature and purpose, the Apostolic Church since the time the biblical canon was finalized and its doctrine systematized around the 4th/5th century, has (to put it mildly) failed to do justice to God’s munificence. Hence “The Little Book” (link#1) – sweet to the taste but likely to create bitterness in the abdomen (Greek: koilos) through that which had previously been assimilated, once God’s magnanimous providence has been ingested (Rev10:10). For in terms of the Catholic Church, it was not until the 1960s Vatican II’s “Lumen Gentium” that God’s broader benign providence towards “people of good will” was articulated at the conciliar level. But in this former Calvinist’s estimation, such broader benign providence has not been adequately underpinned from Scripture. Nor could it be without deconstructing much Augustinian-derived theology – a matter I have been attending to since I was made aware of these truths.

WAITING AND PRAYING – FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

Having begun my 50+ year Christian journey from a diametrically opposite position, I was made aware after my first spiritual encounter in the middle of training for the Baptist ministry (1998), that the Church at Rome is the assembly whose bishop is intended to be primus inter pares for the whole Church militant – the one with whom every Christian assembly should ideally be incorporated or (more realistically) affiliated. That is “for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ when we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Eph4:12-13).

But as I have been intimating, that cannot occur until all assemblies, Rome included (and to a lesser extent the Greek Church) acknowledge substantial doctrinal error – summarized in my 95 theses and set out in full in The Little Book of Providence [Link below]. Clearly such an acknowledgement would only be forthcoming if it became widely recognized that I, though a spiritual and intellectual pygmy, am in accordance with God’s good humour, an instrument for this purpose (Mt11:25; cf. Rev10:7). That is why I earnestly pray for YOU, the reader. For if the Spirit affirms in your mind and conscience that I write the truth, you could have a pivotal role to play in taking the matter forward, especially if you have any personal influence yourself as a priest/pastor/leader/writer or have an association with those who do. I have planted, others may water but only God can bring forth the increase.

ANNOTATIONS

Ref#1 Irenaeus against heresies Book III chapter 25 (para 1)

Ref#2:  Ibid. Book IV chapter 13 para 1

Note #1:  These are two of the three names by which I was addressed in the recording referred to in my Mystery Acoustics post: יִצְחָ֔ק (Yitshak) aka Isaac, denotes one who laughs (or is laughed at), whilst “Charton” is an obscure surname denoting a carter or coachman (in modern times a busman). According to sources I have identified on internet, the Hebrew and English names are linked. The third personal address I received on the recording is still more extraordinary, being my birth-name “Richard”. For the one who I am sure uttered it is no longer with us.

Note #2 – LUTHER’S QUOTE:

“OF THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH”

Behold what great darkness is in the books of the Fathers concerning faith; yet if the article of justification be darkened it is impossible to smother the grossest error of mankind… Augustine wrote nothing to the purpose concerning faith for he was first roused up and made a man by the Pelagians, in striving against them. I can find no exposition upon the Epistles to the Romans or Galatians where anything is taught pure and aright. Oh, what a happy time have we now in regard to the purity of the doctrine, but alas we little esteem it.^[1] 

^[1] Martin Luther “Table Talk” #DXXX Marshall Montgomery Collection [my highlighting]

Download a free PDF of e-book suitable for desktop computers HERE or larger version suitable for mobiles HERE

---

 

Thesis # 63 of 95 – The vital means for communicating spiritual renewal and ongoing sanctification is through the sacraments of the Church.

Thesis #64 of 95- An essential component of the Christian life is participation in the Divine Eucharist.

 Thesis #65 of 95- The Lord has ensured throughout the Church's history that faithful assemblies in East and West are gathered to Himself, so that from the rising of the sun until its setting a pure sacrifice may be offered to His name.

Thesis #66 of 95 -  In some meaningful albeit mystical sense Christ's body must be eaten and His blood drunk by the Christian for “whoever eats Me will draw life from me" and "Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I live in that person"

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Rom8:29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of his Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brothers 

Jn6:53-56 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood possesses eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.  For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him.

COMMENTS

Through what I have been shown (by the Spirit I believe) even the true Church has propagated substantial doctrinal error through the centuries. Such I also believe was foretold in the Book of Enoch’s Apocalypse of Weeks, as my linked post explains. Despite such fallibility, both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches (divided since the 1054 schism) and those episcopal churches affiliated to them have been enabled to fulfil their primary salvific obligations. For the Lord “has never ceased to gather a people to Himself so that from the rising of the sun until its setting a pure sacrifice is offered to His name”. As universal sacrament for the world, the Apostolic Church, East and West has ensured that the fullness of sacramental provision necessary for gospel salvation (sometimes with more besides) has been provided in each century for every generation of the Christian era, such that those appointed to eternal life (Acts13:48) might be supplied for divine service now and in the ages to come.

The 95 theses taken as a whole affirm that everyone who responds positively to conscience demonstrate themselves to be “of God” as opposed to being like Cain “of the Wicked One” (1Jn3:11-12). However, atheists, agnostics and those of other faiths cannot be presented “faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy” (Jud1:24). That requires one to become a disciple of Jesus Christ and a partaker of Jesus Christ in order to become conformed to His image (Rom8:29). To do so one must draw on His spiritual life-force by (in some meaningful sense) eating His flesh and drinking His blood, for “whoever eats Me will draw life from Me (Jn6:57).

The eucharist – our sanctification

Receiving this Sacrament might be likened to the body’s blood flowing through the heart and being renewed and cleansed by it: spiritual life is renewed and refreshed by participation in the Eucharist. Yet it is no mechanical process even for those regularly attending this means of grace. Faith is required just as it was when Jesus was physically present on earth by those who would be healed by Him. The pupil of the apostle John (Ignatius) affirmed this Sacrament to be the medicine of immortality. Yet it is more than a salve it is a Saviour (i.e. a Person). The Eucharistic meal possesses the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ, not through the magic of a priest but by the Holy Spirit imprecated by him. One must have faith to regard it as such if one is fully to benefit from its transforming power for one is not merely receiving medicine for the soul but a Person to relate to it. 

Of course, many sincere believers in Christ will not accept such teaching regarding the Eucharist/Mass/Divine Liturgy/Lord’s Supper. For the first 28 years of my Christian life, I did not either. Key to the change in my understanding was a study of the Early Church Fathers, i.e. the teaching and observations of those who had been tutored by the apostles themselves or the likes of Timothy, Jude, Philemon or the men they personally tutored (which takes us into the early to middle second century). I reviewed their writings on the subject in an earlier post. This is reinforced by the witness of Irenaeus and Church historian Eusebius, the former theologian in particular witnessing to the unity of liturgy within the churches of the second century.   

Although I cannot be certain how the Lord will at last deal with those who have sought to be faithful to Him but are genuinely ignorant of these matters, These four related theses testify to the assertion there is no salvation outside the Apostolic Church (as defined above). But as the previous post/thesis delineated, by “salvation” I mean SALVATION: those to whom Paul refers as heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ, who suffer with Him that they might be also glorified with Him (Rom8:17); those who are seeking to attain the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus (Phi3:14). That does not equate to who does or does not go to heaven when they die, which has more to do with the final judgement parable in Mt25. However the issue under consideration does determine whether or not one can attain an inheritance reserved for those who are sanctified (Acts20:32).

[יִצְחָ֔ק] Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE

THESIS #62 of 95 - Biblical salvation is the restoration of divine communion whilst still incarnate through spiritual regeneration and devotion to Christ and His teaching. This is what is meant by being raised to eternal life. It is for fallen man to become re-acquainted with God, His Son and Spirit before physical death (or Christ’s return) so that the called chosen and faithful may be fitted for future glory as the corporate Bride of Christ.

BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Jn17:3 THIS is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent

Jn6:53 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves

Rom7:24-25 Wretched man that I am! Who will SET ME FREE FROM THE BODY OF THIS DEATH? Thanks be to God; it is through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I with my mind serve the law of God, but with my flesh the law of sin

Rom8:29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters

Rev19:7 Let’s rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, because the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His bride has prepared herself

Rev3:21 The one who overcomes, I will grant to him to sit with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat with My Father on His throne.

1Thes4:4- That each of you know how to POSSESS HIS OWN VESSEL in sanctification and honour

Rom8:23  Also we who have the first fruits of the Spirit, even we groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for adoption as sons, namely THE REDEMPTION OF OUR BODY!!!

COMMENTS

The last few theses have identified what gospel salvation is not, i.e., the means by which a soul can enter heaven. This thesis defines what salvation in Christ really is. The selected texts indicate what such salvation is from, what it is for, and why proportionally few shall attain it. Also, how such a limitation is to be reconciled with Paul’s assertion that God desires that all people are ultimately soul-healed and come to a knowledge of the truth. And let’s face it, such broader benevolence is what one would expect to be the intention of the One whom the apostle John defines as Love personified.

SALVATION FROM WHAT?

In terms of what people are to be saved from, as just stated it is not “eternal damnation”. That in part is in view of the temporal nature of the problem from which we need to be delivered in order to fulfil our eternal destiny. In the case of the elect that is co-heirship with Jesus Christ, no less – to be His corporate bride in the ages to come (Rom8:17; Rev3:21; Rev19:7). It should be evident from that statement and its supporting texts why this is likely to be the preserve of the proportional few.

More precisely, what the elect, in fact all of us at some point, need to be delivered from is the physical transience and moral ineptitude of the procreated intellectual vessel every soul enters at birth. By “procreated intellectual vessel” I simply refer to the body and brain – the part of us that ceases to function when we die. The Apostle Paul refers to that same entity quite literally as “the flesh”, distinguishing it from our eternal spiritual essence that returns to God at brain death to await re-embodiment. The apostle also employs the term “body of this death” (Rom7:24) and “vessel” (2Cor4:7; 1Thes4:4). Approaching his death, the apostle Peter refers to the same as the “tent” or “tabernacle” that he must shortly set aside (2Pet1:13+14). The key point being it is a temporary feature of our never-ending existence that is the source of our problem with sin, as Paul’s usually misunderstood passage in Rom7 makes clear (vv14-25).

One reason that passage is so often misunderstood is because the human spirit to which Paul refers (which he is simply and literally distinguishing from the fleshly body and brain) is often deemed by translators and interpreters to be referring to the Holy Spirit. This is a matter I have worked through at some length in earlier posts, attaining support for the case from the Textus Receptus Greek [note 1].

SALVATION’S PURPOSE

In terms of the purpose of gospel salvation, only those who have a personal knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ can be saved from Paul’s “body of this death” whilst still inhabiting it (Rom7:24,25). The rest will not escape its moral/spiritual and physical incumbrances (being the consequence of the Fall) until physical death. However, the problem post-mortem for those who fail to apprehend the gospel is that unless they die in infancy their vessel/tent that their souls inhabit is, through its innate concupiscence, likely to tarnish the spiritual essence it houses (1Pet2:11). Such a soul will be in no position to be “presented faultless before the presence of God’s glory with exceeding joy” (Jude1:24). Indeed, in some cases it will require a measure of salting/purging if it is to take any positive role in “a new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (2Pet3:13).

God’s elect on the other hand, being the called, chosen and faithful, having been empowered by the Holy Spirit and informed by divine teaching, should have disciplined themselves to follow the inclinations of their spirit rather than succumbing to the flesh so that they might be raised to eternal Life (Rom8:13). Partaking sacramentally in the Lord’s body and blood, their “consciences are purged from dead works to serve the living God” (Heb9:14; cf. 1Jn1:7). The generations of saints who have died shall be raised on the last day (Jn6:54; Rev20:6). They, together with faithful disciples who live to see the Parousia shall “meet Christ in the air” (1Thes4:17). Whether alive or resurrected, their souls will have been ready prepared for the unspeakable glories destined for the elect in the ages to come.

THE FRUIT OF CHRIST’S PASSION

As the previous post/thesis affirmed, divine grace and the redemptive work of Jesus Christ are the core elements of all human salvation. Yet the benefits of Christ’s Passion  function at two levels: forensic and participatory. The former relates to God’s pardon of and propitiation for human sin throughout the world (1Jn2:2); the latter to the sanctification and imparting of spiritual vitality to the proportionally few who sacramentally partake of Christ’s body and blood (Jn6:53).

This is merely the bare bones of what I have been shown on this subject. Such a thesis pertaining to the very nature and purpose of gospel salvation needs to be supported by a workable synopsis of the whole bible. Thanks be to God, it has been.

[יִצְחָ֔ק]

NOTE #1 – For example, Rom8:4 – “The requirement of the law is fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the spirit”. The early scribes who penned the Textus Receptus knew Paul to be referring to the human spirit not the Holy Spirit, hence they wrote πνεῦμα rather than Πνεύμα [Rom8:4 Greek – ignore the  translation, observe the Greek text; Likewise Rom8:1]. When Paul is clearly referring to the Holy Spirit, the scribes have penned Πνεύμα [e.g. 1Cor12:3].

It should be pointed out that the original New Testament text was written entirely in capital letters with no spaces or punctuation. So, whether the Greek word for “spirit” was a capital or lowercase Pi is a scribe-based rather than genuinely textually based issue. But the point is that my interpretation is in line with that of the early scribes with regard to whether Paul is referring to the Holy Spirit or the human spirit, a matter critical to a right understanding of Paul’s teaching on salvation and the believers’ participation within it.

.

Author’s FACEBOOK page HERE